SOME FEATURES OF THE CORONAVIRUS INFECTION COURSE IN BRONCHIAL ASTHMA PATIENTS

The outbreak of a new coronavirus infection was officially recognized by the World Health Organization as a global pandemic since March 11, 2020. The pandemic is currently gradually receding, the number of patients is also steadily decreasing. However, these circumstances are not grounds to believe that the virus has been definitively and irrevocably defeated. For this reason, the world medical community is still concerned about the coronavirus' impact on the course and outcome of various chronic bronchopulmonary diseases. Bronchial asthma has been recognized as one of the leading forms of human somatic pathology throughout the history of mankind and medicine. It is quite natural that the focus of the researchers' attention turned out to be questions about the SARS-CoV-2 virus' impact on patients suffering from bronchial asthma, starting with the peculiarities of the course of combined pathology and ending with the peculiarities of therapy and subsequent rehabilitation. The issues of coronavirus infection and bronchial asthma pathogenesis were considered. The research data on some features of the development and course of a new coronavirus infection in patients with this profile were analyzed and summarized. The low coronavirus infection prevalence among patients with an allergic bronchial asthma form compared with other phenotypes is shown among such features, data on the effect of eosinophilia on the course of infection are presented, and the basic therapy's positive effect using inhaled glucocorticosteroids and/or monoclonal antibodies (biological therapy) in severe asthma, is shown in the form of a protective effect that provides a lighter coronavirus infection course. The main features of patient management suffering from bronchial asthma in the conditions of a pandemic are the organization of stable medical control in online telemedicine once monthly, regular examinations in accordance with the severity of the course of the disease and the correction of basic therapy to achieve complete control over the course of asthma. The article can be used under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license © Authors, 2022.

Impact of rituximab on humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in previously vaccinated patients with autoimmune diseases.

SARS-CoV-2 infection is more severe in patients undergoing rituximab (RTX) treatment. Humoral response to vaccination is severely impaired in patients already treated with RTX, but data on antibody persistence in patients initiating RTX are lacking. We evaluated the impact of RTX initiation on humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in previously vaccinated patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. We performed a retrospective, multicenter study evaluating the evolution of anti-spike antibodies and breakthrough infections after initiation of RTX in previously vaccinated patients with protective levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Threshold for anti-S antibodies positivity and protection were 30 and 264 BAU/mL, respectively. We included 31 previously vaccinated patients initiating RTX (21 female, median age 57 years). At first RTX infusion, 12 (39%) patients had received 2 doses of vaccine, 15 (48%) had received 3 doses, and 4 (13%) had received 4 doses. The most frequent underlying diseases were ANCA-associated vasculitis (29%) and rheumatoid arthritis (23%). Median anti-S antibody titers at RTX initiation, 3 months, and 6 months were 1620 (589-2080), 1055 (467-2080), and 407 (186-659) BAU/mL, respectively. Overall, antibody titers waned by almost two-fold at 3 months and four-fold at 6 months. Median antibody titers were significantly higher in patients who received ≥3 doses compared to those who received only 2 doses. Three patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection without any severe symptom. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers in previously vaccinated patients decline after RTX initiation similarly to general population. Specific monitoring is useful to anticipate prophylactic strategies. Key Points • Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers in previously vaccinated patients decline after rituximab initiation similarly to the general population. • The number of dose of vaccine before rituximab initiation is associated with higher antibody titers at month 3. • Monitoring antibody levels is mandatory to initiate prophylactic strategies in this population.

Organization of immunobiological therapy for severe bronchial asthma in the Sverdlovsk region

BACKGROUND: Biologicals use in severe asthma (SA) is associated with targeted therapy (TT) availability problem. Ensuring the availability of biologicals can be resolved within the territorial compulsory medical insurance program (TCMIP) in day-stay or round-the-clock hospital. AIMS: This study aimed to develop and implement a program for immunobiological therapy (IBT) introduction for SA in Sverdlovsk Region (SR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Program for introduction of IBT for SA was developed in SR in 2018 to provide patients with expensive biologicals within the TCMIP. Program includes the following: SA prevalence study in SR;practitioners training in differential diagnosis of SA;organization of affordable therapy for patients with SA;registration of patients with SA creation and maintenance;and selection and management of patients with SA in accordance with federal clinical guidelines. RESULT(S): Atopic phenotype in SA was detected in 5%, eosinophilic - in 2.3% of all analyzed cases of asthma (n=216). Practitioners of SR were trained in differential diagnosis of SA. Orders of the Ministry of Health of SR were issued as follows: regulating the procedure for referring patients with SA to IBT, with a list of municipal medical organizations providing IBT in a day-stay or round-the-clock hospital;approving regional registration form of patients with SA requiring biologicals use;ungrouping of clinical and statistical groups of day-stay hospital was depending on INN and dosage of biologicals;and selecting patients with SA for TT and including them in the regional register. Initiating of TT in round-the-clock hospital and continuation therapy in day-stay hospital provides a significant savings in compulsory medical insurance funds. CONCLUSION(S): IBT introduction for SA in SR is carried out within the framework of the developed program. Principle of decentralization brings highly specialized types of medical care closer to patients making it possible to provide routine medical care in "allergology-immunology" profile in the context of restrictions caused by coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.Copyright © 2020 Pharmarus Print Media All rights reserved.

Economic aspects of COVID-19 treatment in a hospital setting

In April 2020 in order to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus infection COVID-19 on the territory of the Russian Federation, strict quarantine measures were introduced. In the shortest possible time, a large number of general hospitals were repurposed into COVID hospitals, recommendations were issued on the management of patients with a new coronavirus infection based on the existing global experience. The limited resources of the healthcare system in a pandemic require research into the pharmacoeconomic aspects of COVID-19. In the course of the study, a continuous retrospective analysis of the case histories of 6255 patients admitted to the Central Clinical Hospital RZD-Medicine was carried out. During the study period, 22% of patients received biological therapy. The average mortality rate of patients on biological therapy is 11.6%. An individual selection of the therapeutic dose of low molecular weight heparins was carried out, which showed high clinical efficacy. The developed methods were assessed from the perspective of pharmacoeconomics. The increase in the degree of damage to the lung tissue in patients with COVID-19, as well as the presence of concomitant diseases, entails an increase in the cost of treatment. Biotherapy can reduce the cost of treating patients with CT-4 by 16% by reducing the length of stay in the intensive care unit, the need for mechanical ventilation and reducing mortality.Copyright © 2021 Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training. All rights reserved.

Two years of the COVID-19 pandemic in the population of Czech patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biological therapy*experience of the tertiary IBD center.

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be associated with a more severe course of infections and a different response to vaccination, especially in complicated IBD course and in association with immune-modifying IBD treatment. The aim of this study was to describe COVID-19 pandemic during years 2020 2022 in IBD patients with long-Term biological therapy. Method(s): A retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence in the population of 1,177 IBD (Crohn s disease or ulcerative colitis) patients with long-Term biological therapy (IBD cohort) was performed. The incidence rate, crude incidence rate and standardized incidence ratio of COVID-19 in the IBD cohort, the odds ratio of infection depending on the type of biologic therapy administered, the dynamics of COVID-19 incidence depending on the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant in the population and the current vaccination coverage of the IBD cohort were calculated. Result(s): From January 2020 to April 2022, 548 confirmed cases of COVID-19 (46.6%) were reported in the IBD cohort, with 39% share of PCR positivity in vaccinated individuals and with 95% occurrence of infection in unvaccinated part of the IBD cohort. Standardized incidence rate ratio of COVID-19 was 27% higher in the IBD cohort compared to the general Czech population. The dynamics of the development of the number of positive cases of COVID-19 in the IBD cohort was identical to the situation in the entire country. A higher odds ratio of the chances of infection was demonstrated in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, but not in patients treated with anti-integrins or monoclonal antibodies against interleukins. In the IBD cohort, 85.2% of patients were properly vaccinated, which was significantly more than the vaccination rate of the entire Czech population. Discussion and conclusion: During the two pandemic years, the incidence of COVID-19 in patients with severe IBD and long-Term biological treatment was higher compared to the general Czech population, despite the favorable vaccination coverage of this high-risk patients group. A higher risk was associated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy.Copyright © 2023 Galen s.r.o.. All rights reserved.

Influenza outcomes in patients with inflammatory joint diseases and DMARDs: how do they compare to those of COVID-19?

OBJECTIVES: To estimate absolute and relative risks for seasonal influenza outcomes in patients with inflammatory joint diseases (IJDs) and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). To contextualise recent findings on corresponding COVID-19 risks. METHODS: Using Swedish nationwide registers for this cohort study, we followed 116 989 patients with IJD and matched population comparators across four influenza seasons (2015-2019). We quantified absolute risks of hospitalisation and death due to influenza, and compared IJD to comparators via Cox regression. We identified 71 556 patients with IJD on active treatment with conventional synthetic DMARDs and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tsDMARDs) at the start of each influenza season, estimated risks for the same outcomes and compared these risks across DMARDs via Cox regression. RESULTS: Per season, average risks for hospitalisation listing influenza were 0.25% in IJD and 0.1% in the general population, corresponding to a crude HR of 2.38 (95% CI 2.21 to 2.56) that decreased to 1.44 (95% CI 1.33 to 1.56) following adjustments for comorbidities. For death listing influenza, the corresponding numbers were 0.015% and 0.006% (HR=2.63, 95% CI 1.93 to 3.58, and HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.01). Absolute risks for influenza outcomes were half (hospitalisation) and one-tenth (death) of those for COVID-19, but relative estimates comparing IJD to the general population were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In absolute terms, COVID-19 in IJD outnumbers that of average seasonal influenza, but IJD entails a 50%-100% increase in risk for hospitalisation and death for both types of infections, which is largely dependent on associated comorbidities. Overall, bDMARDs/tsDMARDs do not seem to confer additional risk for hospitalisation or death related to seasonal influenza.

Consensus statement on blocking interleukin-6 receptor and interleukin-6 in inflammatory conditions: an update.

BACKGROUND: Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the specific receptor using anti-IL-6Rα antibodies or by directly inhibiting the IL-6 cytokine. This paper is an update of a previous consensus document, based on most recent evidence and expert opinion, that aims to inform on the medical use of interfering with the IL-6 pathway. METHODS: A systematic literature research was performed that focused on IL-6-pathway inhibitors in inflammatory diseases. Evidence was put in context by a large group of international experts and patients in a subsequent consensus process. All were involved in formulating the consensus statements, and in the preparation of this document. RESULTS: The consensus process covered relevant aspects of dosing and populations for different indications of IL-6 pathway inhibitors that are approved across the world, including rheumatoid arthritis, polyarticular-course and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still's disease, Castleman's disease, chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell-induced cytokine release syndrome, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and severe COVID-19. Also addressed were other clinical aspects of the use of IL-6 pathway inhibitors, including pretreatment screening, safety, contraindications and monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: The document provides a comprehensive consensus on the use of IL-6 inhibition to treat inflammatory disorders to inform healthcare professionals (including researchers), patients, administrators and payers.